For this week's Critical Analysis, you will be reading 2 articles regarding a recent lawsuit regarding copyright law. You will then answer the questions below. Post your answers as a comment to this blog post—make sure to post to the correct class period's blog post. First, read the articles below: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/09/12/550417823/-animal-rights-advocates-photographer-compromise-over-ownership-of-monkey-selfie http://time.com/5251925/peta-monkey-selfie-lawsuit-dismissed/ Next, answer these questions in complete sentences:
Catherine Clausewitz
4/30/2018 09:22:36 am
This article is about a monkey who took a picture of himself on a human camera. The man, who’s name is David Slater, was in Indonesia when the monkey grabbed his camera and took a photo of itself. The issue is whether the image belongs to the monkey or the Slater. 4/30/2018 09:25:48 am
1. In 2011, a macaques in Indonesia, named Naruto, took a selfie using David Slater’s camera. PETA filed a suit against him, claiming the copyright belonged to the animal rather than him. However, the court decided otherwise; Slater kept the copyright on the photograph.
Chase Blackwell
4/30/2018 09:26:22 am
What are the articles about? What is the issue, and who are the people, organizations, and animals involved?
Andi Feik
4/30/2018 09:29:07 am
1.The articles are about a monkey taking a photo on a photographers camera and the photographer being sued because People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals believe that the monkey should have the copyright to the image.
Kaitlyn Evans
4/30/2018 09:33:30 am
1. These articles are about a monkey named Naruto who accidently took a photo using David Slater’s camera. PETA is trying to file a lawsuit against Dylan Slater saying that the monkey should have the rights to the photograph and that Dylan Slater has copyrighted the photograph. Dylan Slater, PETA and a monkey named Naruto are involved in this case.
Melody Umsted
4/30/2018 09:34:23 am
The articles are about a court case concerning animals’ rights and copyright laws. A monkey took a selfie on David Slater’s camera, and they are trying to decide if Slater or the monkey, Naruto, should own the copyright to the photos.
Melody Umsted
4/30/2018 09:35:46 am
1. The articles are about a court case concerning animals’ rights and copyright laws. A monkey took a selfie on David Slater’s camera, and they are trying to decide if Slater or the monkey, Naruto, should own the copyright to the photos. 4/30/2018 09:36:16 am
The articles are about a lawsuit by PETA to a photographer named David Slater. PETA was suing David because he sold a selfie taken by a monkey in Indonesia. 4/30/2018 09:42:06 am
1. These articles are about a court case regarding a lawsuit given to a photographer because he possessed and was profiting off of a photo made by a monkey on his camera, and whether or not that monkey should have the copyright to the photo. The issue is that a group is arguing that the monkey should own the copyright to the photo and the man should not be allowed to profit off of it. The people, organizations, and animals involved are David Slater, The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the U.S. Copyright Office, Wikipedia, and a macaque monkey named Naruto.
Julieta Vazquez Martinez
4/30/2018 09:42:44 am
What are the articles about? What is the issue, and who are the people, organizations, and animals involved?
Adriana Vazquez
4/30/2018 09:45:11 am
1.Both articles are about the copyright of a selfie taken by a monkey.These articles say the fight that the U.S court is having about who should own the copyrights. The monkey, who now goes by the name of Naruto, the photographer David Slater and the PETA organization are all involved in this issue. 4/30/2018 09:48:30 am
This a case that may seem a bit silly at first but is actually pretty hard to decide on. Back in two thousand and eleven, a macaque which is a type of monkey. His name was naruto and he took a photographers camera and took a selfie of himself. The picture turned out to be quite good. The posing question of the case is who owns the picture, the man or the monkey. Many people were part of this case from the U.S. copyright office and even wikipedia. PETA recently filed out a form against david slater which is the man own the camera. David then agreed to give twenty five percent of future revenue produced by sales from the picture to be given to the groups that protect crested macaques and their habitat in Indonesia. In Twenty fifteen, PETA claimed that the copyright right does not expand to animals. David now makes all the profit but clamies on his website that he donates ten percent to a monkey conservation project. I think that the monkey should not have copyrights for the photo. The monkey is an animal and has no capability to do something with that money. On the opposite side i could argue that the monkey does have copyrights and can have money towards bettering his species. Comments are closed.
|
AnalyzeUse this guide if you are stuck on what to write about: Archives
March 2022
Categories
All
|